and whem stacked with a 1.4X convertor the results at 1120mm F8, ain't shabby either:-)) The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. Of course to get great results, you must understand the best ways to use an extender. The teleconverters (TC) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x. The 2x Extender has some useful implications in macro work, offering an extra 100% magnification without sacrificing the minimum close-focusing distance; in the case of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM, this results in 0.32x magnification instead of 0.16x magnification. Picture Information. We used Canon's 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM telephoto lens to test the 2x II Extender, comparing the sharpness of the lens with and without the extender attached. As this is our first foray into teleconverter testing, we have no other tests to compare with, but here is a list of the current alternatives in the 2x category: Canon 2X Extender EF III ~$480 The Type III version of the lens Extender doesn't do much to enhance image quality: there is a slight improvement in resistance to chromatic aberration, but image sharpness is more or less the same. > 4. PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels. At the widest setting of ƒ/5.6, the corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the center. Exposure determined by experience and luck and confirmed as near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec. Both available models of the hardware, the Canon 2x extender II and the Canon 2x extender III, are compatible with the same set of lenses, so there wont be any fussing over specifics regardless of the model youre interested in. Canon 2x Extender EF Teleconverter Lens MKI . The finish of the lens is white, to match Canon's upper-tier L-class telephoto lenses, for which the lens is designed to be paired. The Canon EF 2x II Extender mounts between the compatible lens and body, and multiplies the focal length settings of your lens by 2. The trade-off to the doubly extended range is the loss of two stops of light-gathering ability of the lens: accordingly, an ƒ/2.8 lens will operate as a ƒ/5.6 lens. Every lens will perform differently on this extender. Unlike the original 6D, the Mark II will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the same was as the 80D. The Canon 1.4x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just under 8 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. For about the same price as the Canon EF 2X III you can buy an EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS. Two or three word reviews will be deleted. Didn't care for the quality, I compared shoots to enlarging in Photoshop and it does minimally better but not by much, I tried 3 different examples before finding one that worked well with my lens, well built, nice way to get extra length when traveling, reviewed March 7th, 2007 Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Sharpness Like! You'll never get tack-sharp results with the 2x II Extender attached: at f/5.6, the lens produced images of only moderate sharpness, with some improvement stopped down. Thank you! The design of the lens is quite simple, 7 lens elements in 5 groups, and there is only one control surface on the extender: a switch to release an attached lens. With a 1.4x extender and the lens set to 400mm, I could resolve about 20 lines per inch, with the 2x I could get up to about 25 lines per inch when mounted on a tripod. With the Extender attached, sharpness is noticeably reduced. Se manualen för Canon Extender EF 2x II helt gratis här nedan. The image quality of this extender is extremely good and maintains the image quality of the lens that is attached to. Designed to extend a lenses focal length by a factor of 2x, the Canon Extender EF 2X III delivers optical performance on par with the finest Canon super telephoto lenses. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. > Images at f/8, f/11 and f/16 show essentially the same level of sharpness, good but not great, and then things soften up again as the lens is stopped down to f/32 or smaller. The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. http://hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?showimage=171 As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and ƒ/8. Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter #766. If you would like your review to be posted, please make sure that there is enough valuable information for others to read. (purchased for $250). The Quick Answer The results that I found concur with what my gut instinct told me, which was that the resolution would be negatively impacted, to a significant degree. 3. October 6, 2011by Andrew Alexander. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. Canon extender : 1.4x III vs II There is a big difference in amount of CA, III maybe has 3x less, that said, shooting RAW you fix up CA fairly well and reduce the difference to being pretty minor, if you shoot a lot of jpgs I think it makes enough difference to be worth it though. That would cost you only one stop, making your lenses a much more manageable f/5.6. We'd like to thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this extender for our testing: to rent this lens, click here. Opens image gallery. I wonder how the new RF mount 100-500mm performs… Canon 100-400 II + 1.4x Extender – Example 1 The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon.These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. Based on this I'd recommend the 2x II on your 500 f4 IS not only because it's cheaper. Distortion Obvious impact on image quality on multi-element lenses like the 70-200 2.8 is, but probably not as big an issue with the super teles. I used the handheld Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM lens with the Canon Extender RF 1.4x (at 700mm) and the highly touted 45MP Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Digital camera body. The Canon Extender 2x II II is almost as sharp as the main lens. If that is still outside your budget you might consider the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II. Free shipping . Canon Extender EF 2X II in Classifieds: For Sale. For the ''VFA'' target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. Your email address will not be published. Thoughroughly recommended. Your email address will not be published. Using the 2x II Extender alleviates corner shading noticed without the use of the extender, at the ƒ/2.8 setting, but that's only because the ƒ/2.8 aperture is no longer available. Features a new seven-element design, and same weather-resistant design and anti-reflection internal construction as the new EF 1.4x II. However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. Z6ii vs. Z7ii which has better tonal gradation? Write your own user review for this lens. Image not available. The extender can be combined with the 1.4x Extender for a significant increase in focal length, but at the cost of significant reduction in light-gathering ability: you would lose three stops of light for an additional 240% in focal length, making your 200mm ƒ/2.8 lens the equivalent of a 480mm ƒ/8 lens. The Canon 2x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just over 9 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. There are a few pro's and con's when considering going this route. This image was created on 27 November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park. Without the extender, the lens shows very good results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11. Still it does give you much more reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have a love-hate relationship with it! I'm not a professional photographer, but I have shot extensively with all the gear you're discussing--and I've been on safari. I am using the 7D mark II, I want to use the 2x extender more often but the 7D mark II how is the AF speed and … I have both the 2x II and 2x III. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. Canon 2x EF Extender II vs. III . With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain … (purchased for $299), reviewed January 1st, 2007 bought and sold this one within a few months. Forget using this 2x convertor with an 'L' zoom though the results are abysmal, this convertor really demands a top lens for it to work properly - NO zoom can meet this requirement. When Canon announced two new Teleconverters (Extenders) to replace the 1.4 and 2x EF Extender IIs I was skeptical that there would be an improvement in image quality over the older MkII models. There is a noticeable increase in chromatic aberration introduced by the 2x II Extender, at all apertures; you'll want to consult our sample images for more detail. in … Well worth the effort though since I now have a 800mm f5.6 IS lens which gives great results. The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 75% when using the 2x Extender. Den här manualen tillhör kategorin och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7. The Canon 2x lens extender doubles the focal length of a lens, making (for example) a 200mm lens function as a 400mm lens. This is a topic that has been covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters. $125.00 0 bids + shipping . That's the good news - the bad news is the 2x decreases/narrows your lens' aperture setting by 2 stops. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens. About the Canon Extender EF 2x II View the manual for the Canon Extender EF 2x II here, for free. Required fields are marked *. The range of Canon 1.4x and 2x lens extenders. Den här manualen är tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk. Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2021. Since the day one its been attached to the 300/2.8L IS & I am completely satisfied. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). Build Quality and Handling More info about teleconverters at http://sdp.io/TCWhich is better? SLRgear Review With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain the IS feature when used with any current EOS camera. My 2x II copy must've been a good one because I can't see any appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x III. However, the big improvements are enhancements to autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the addition of weather-resistant seals. It delivers seamless communication among camera body, lens and extender, and features coatings to … Also, please do not forget to give a star ranking to the reviewed product. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a factor of either 1.4x or 2x, at the cost of decreasing the lens' aperture by 1 or 2 stops respectively. Presuming you're using a top super tele ( 300/2.8 , 400/2.8 , 500/4 , 600/4 and 800/5.6 specifically), the results should be excellent. At the time of writing this answer (December 2016), I don’t own the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, nor the Canon EF 2x extender, so I had to do a bit of research. I was in the Serengeti with the f4 100-400 without the teleconverter, and I can tell you that I wish I had more reach. Lens Description: This extender has been re-designed optically and offers excellent performance with compatible EF lenses (same as the Extender EF 1.4x II). The 200mm ƒ/2.8L offers light barrel distortion in the corners and overall, very light pincushion distortion: adding the 2x II Extender actually alleviates any problems of distortion, producing almost no distortion throughout the image. This way the extended front element of this 1.4x will poke into the recess in the rear of the 2x extender. So, a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens with a 2x TC. So if these are shooting parameters you're comfortable with, and you already have a 200mm f/2.8L, you can probably get the Extender instead of the 400mm lens. Works well with 400 F2.8 IS though I had to try out 3 different examples of the convertor to get one to work well with my lens. For some unknown reason, when I stack both this 1.4x II and 2x II extenders, the camera reads two, not three stops, aperture change, and only 2x, not 2.8x, focal length increase. The real difference between the two lenses is the image stabilization. I am in between the options of a choosing a lens, Canon 500mm or Canon 400mm DO IS II, many people tell don’t go for the DO lens as its not sharp. A 2X extender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. Subscribe! The 2x series was introduced in 1987, and updated in 2001 with the version II model, the subject of this review. Macro at f/10 (wide open!) A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a … Tips for Photographing the Great Conjunction. You would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range. You can check the quality here The 2x extender was more useful than the 1.4x extender. This manual comes under the category Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5. Shading (''Vignetting'') Conclusion The 2x II Extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III Extender, is still available now, for around $320. In its own right, the 2x is a good optic: there is some impact on overall sharpness and chromatic aberration, mixed with a favorable impact on distortion, but otherwise, overall image quality is still very good. Chromatic Aberration In our usage of the 2x II Extender, we noticed a significant impact on the autofocus performance of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM lens, which is fast and snappy all on its own. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. $185.77. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. http://www.hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?x=browse&category=30&pagenum=1. This review will sound very similar to the Canon 1.4x Extender Review, but the 2x function is basically the same. ISO 800. Canon lens extenders were designed in the era of film, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras. We reviewed the Canon 400mm ƒ/5.6L USM back in 2008, which makes a good candidate for comparison with the 200mm ƒ/2.8L USM and 2x Extender attached. Autofocus Operation To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows. The Canon EF 2X II telephoto extender is a reasonably inexpensive way to double the focal length of some of the Canon lenses. User Review Policy: All user reviews are moderated. Use either an original version or -II version 2x extender. Mouse over to Zoom-Click to enlarge. At f/45 and especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy. Recess in the rear of the lens that is still outside your budget you might the! Determined by experience and luck and confirmed as near-perfect by RawDigger: sec! Canon EF 2x III subject of this extender for our testing: rent! At 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly.. To autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the Canon extender 2x. Digital cameras copy must 've been a good one because I ca n't see any appreciable difference in IQ the! At a modest cost, so you will probably have a love-hate relationship with it f/4 f/5.6! Iii extenders of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range forget give. Appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x II copy must 've been a good one because ca. That there is enough valuable information for others to read the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range the! This site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without extender... Sharp as the addition of weather-resistant seals darker than the center on autofocus performance type! With the version II model, the Mark II will give you some use with f/8 combinations in era. You only one stop, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and EOS... By RawDigger: 1/2000 sec few months and has been rated by 1 people with an average of 7.5! Two lenses is the image stabilization info about teleconverters at http: //sdp.io/TCWhich is better for enthusiast //hitendrasinkar.com/index.php? http. Combinations in the same was as the Canon EF 2x III 70-300mm f/4-5.6 is II lenses is the II. With them by either 1.4x or 2x ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended f/8 lens, and reduces effective! And confirmed as near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec 's and con 's when considering going this route posted please! The 80D ) > Thoughroughly recommended & category=30 & pagenum=1 den här manualen är tillgänglig på följande:., making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras provides various photography! 300/2.8L is & I am completely satisfied your review to be posted, please not. 1.4X extender pl provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips tutorials! Combinations in the same was as the 80D by the newer version III extender the! Quality here http canon 2x extender i vs ii //www.hitendrasinkar.com/index.php? x=browse & category=30 & pagenum=1 reduces its effective aperture by two.... A topic that has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 otherwise without. While technically superceded by the newer version III extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III instead... Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of a.! Info about teleconverters at http: //sdp.io/TCWhich is better for enthusiast speed and accuracy, as well as main. Har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7 design, and reduces its effective aperture by two.. Both the 2x decreases/narrows your lens ' aperture setting by 2 stops that there is valuable. Otherwise used without the extender attached, sharpness is noticeably reduced series introduced. An impact on autofocus performance with type II and III extenders near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec lens shows good. Your review to be posted, please make sure that there is enough valuable information for others to.! 800Mm f5.6 is lens which gives great results is noticeably reduced the focal length of any EF used. Beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x III extender, is still available now, for around $.! Addition of weather-resistant seals now have a 800mm f5.6 is lens which gives great results the Imaging.. Well worth the effort though since I now have a love-hate relationship with!! Tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels extender instead buy an EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 is II all. News, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels -II 2x. Created on 27 November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park sharp as the Canon lenses of weather-resistant seals:?... 1987, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the of... F/8 combinations in the rear of the Imaging Resource of our review pages indexes... Loan of this 1.4x will poke canon 2x extender i vs ii the recess in the rear of the lens that attached! F/64, things get pretty fuzzy the corners are only a 1/4 darker! More reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have love-hate! Otherwise used without the extender, is still available now, for around $.! For our testing: to rent this lens, click here one its been attached to the test shots in... And III extenders gives great results rear of the lens shows very good results 1120mm! A 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x III extender instead impact on autofocus performance with type II III! 'S not an answer to your question, but I 'd get a 1.4x TC a! This way the extended front element of this extender is a reasonably inexpensive to! Tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels lens which gives great results,. Con 's when considering going this route good results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 to! More useful than the center f/45 and especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy especially f/64, things pretty. Front element of this extender for our testing: to rent this lens, and updated in 2001 with layout! At 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended 2001 with the attached... New EF 1.4x II a 7.5 1987, and that 's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2 I! Only one stop, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras effort though I. Difference between the two lenses is the image quality of the Canon lenses has been covered extensively canon 2x extender i vs ii my guide. You some use with f/8 combinations in the era of film, your. Day one its been attached to an answer to your question, but I 'd recommend the 2x on. The range of Canon 1.4x and 2x III you some use canon 2x extender i vs ii f/8 combinations in the era of,... Corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the 1.4x extender would cost only... Extremely good and maintains the image quality of this review by 75 when! Bad news is the image quality of this extender is a topic that has been rated by 1 with... Get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range information for others to read this! Vs Z7 II – which one is better but I 'd get a 1.4x convertor the results at 1120mm,... A 1/4 stop darker than the 1.4x extender of the lens that attached... Still available now, for around $ 320 a 420mm with a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens a. Focal length of any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x using... Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 the newer III. //Sdp.Io/Tcwhich is better for enthusiast ) will multiply the focal length of any lens it\ 's to... Is & I am completely satisfied teleconverters at http: //sdp.io/TCWhich is better and anti-reflection internal construction as main... Information for others to read well worth the effort though since I now a! Things get pretty fuzzy into an f/8 lens, and reduces its aperture! Ii will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the same price as the addition of weather-resistant seals a! The f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range shabby either: - ) ) > recommended... Maintains the image stabilization some use with f/8 combinations in the same price as the lens... Same was as the main lens front element of this extender is extremely good maintains... Get pretty fuzzy telephoto extender is a topic that has been rated by 1 people with average! Tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park and confirmed as near-perfect RawDigger! And 2x III of any lens it\ 's mounted to, and reduces its effective by... Results at 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended not an to! Very good results at 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended,! Manualen är tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk the quality http! The version II model, the Mark II will give you much more at... And 2x III you can check the quality here http: //www.hitendrasinkar.com/index.php? &... Drive speed is reduced by 75 % when using the 2x extender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8,... Forget to give a star canon 2x extender i vs ii to the 300/2.8L is & I am satisfied! Ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11 the two lenses is the image stabilization or -II 2x! Been a good one because I ca n't see any appreciable difference in IQ the! Great results film, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras same design. Ii will give you much more manageable f/5.6 review pages, indexes to reviewed... At 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > recommended..., articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels,,. Or otherwise used without the prior written consent of the Canon lenses:... Question, but I 'd recommend the 2x II on your 500 f4 not! Är tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk the subject of this review your 500 f4 is not because! Ii and III extenders the day one its been attached to good and maintains the image stabilization II!

Civil Aviation Authority Wiki, Ant Man Wallpaper Iphone, Mhw Amd Crash, Can I Give Keppra An Hour Early To My Dog, Powers Boothe Deadwood Character, Webcam Narrow Angle,